Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Auto Industry Warns Against Ethanol (E15) Fuel Waiver

New standard could jeopardize production systems and cause drivability problems.


(AIAM: Arlington, VA) -- The Association of International Automobile Manufacturers (AIAM) recently filed comments with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) opposing a waiver request that would allow the ethanol content of gasoline to be increased from 10 percent (E10) to 15 percent (E15). The following statement was issued on behalf of Michael J. Stanton, president and CEO of AIAM, outlining the association’s concerns:

“AIAM and its member companies have long recognized the importance of addressing climate change and have supported efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while significantly increasing fuel economy. With so much progress made by government and industry in recent months to meet these goals, we believe it would be premature for EPA to approve the near-term distribution and sale of fuels containing more than 10 percent ethanol without further testing to prevent unintended negative consequences.

“The Clean Air Act requires producers of any new fuel or fuel additive to show that those fuels will not contribute to the failure of vehicles or engines to meet emissions standards. Most vehicles currently being driven by American consumers were not designed to operate on ethanol blends greater than E10. If EPA were to approve the sale of such fuels, we believe a range of problems would result that could jeopardize the control or reduction of automotive emissions.

“These problems include the potential for immediate harm to, or failure of, highly calibrated emissions systems that were not designed to operate on such ‘mid-level’ fuels as E15. Further, many vehicles today are equipped with onboard diagnostic [OBD] systems as part of an integrated emissions control system. Testing to determine how E15 may negatively affect the proper operation of OBD systems is insufficient at this time.

“The consequence of potential equipment malfunctions caused by the use of E15 extends beyond failure to sufficiently control emissions. It will also create a high risk of consumer dissatisfaction due to drivability problems which would needlessly damage product reputation and imperil customer satisfaction with dealer service. Such drivability problems may also tempt consumers to tamper with emission controls in an effort to improve performance. Owner satisfaction may be further jeopardized by the reduction of fuel economy they will experience as a consequence of switching from E10 to E15.

“Another issue yet to be sufficiently studied is the potential negative impact E15 would have on the fuel production, distribution and marketing infrastructure. In particular, EPA should fully evaluate how the addition of a new blend of fuel will affect service station storage and pump systems and the ability of customers to select the right fuel for his or her vehicle.

“AIAM and other industry groups whose products and customers would be affected by the introduction of E15 are working cooperatively with the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct the needed studies to assess the impacts of introducing mid-level ethanol blends to the market. These studies have been identified and stakeholders are moving ahead to fill gaps in current knowledge about the practical consequences of increasing the ethanol content in gasoline.

“To approve a waiver before these studies are completed would be premature. We encourage EPA to delay approval of the waiver until sufficient testing has been conducted.”


For more information, visit www.aiam.org

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Crude prices top $47/bbl in optimistic market

HOUSTON, Mar. 17 -- Oil prices jumped Mar. 16 with crude topping $47/bbl after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said over the weekend the US recession likely will end this year if the government can revitalize the banking system.

In a television interview Mar. 15, Bernanke said, "Until we get [financial markets] stabilized and working normally, we're not going to see recovery."

Olivier Jakob at Petromatrix, Zug, Switzerland, said, "The positive sentiment out of New York managed to fully reverse the negative sentiment out of Vienna" where the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries decided Mar. 15 against another production cut at this time. "While an improving equity market will be positive to oil demand as it creates a higher disposable income, trading oil on the back of equities remains exposed to the timing difference between the close of the two New York exchanges," Jakob said.

On Mar. 16, the Dow Jones Industrial Average gave back most of its daily gains after the close of the New York Mercantile Exchange. "The ability of equities to hold onto the gains of last week will be crucial to West Texas Intermediate being able to hold the $45-50/bbl range," Jakob said. "While WTI keeps a certain correlation to equities, demand is not yet strong enough for the rest of the complex to follow the path of that correlation. The product supply and demand is being capped by a glut of distillate stocks that is really calling for refinery run cuts, and as WTI tries to advance towards the $50/bbl resistance it translates into a further narrowing of the heating oil crack."

At KBC Market Services, a division of KBC Process Technology Ltd. in Surrey, UK, analysts said, "OPEC finally admitted that the collapse of the world economy is too great a force to resist. If 4.2 million b/d of production cuts has not succeeded in moving the world oil price much above $45/bbl for any meaningful length of time, then another cut of 1 million b/d—widely thought to be under serious consideration—is hardly likely to do the trick. So OPEC decided to roll over its agreement and meet again in Vienna on May 28 to see if they can spot any green shoots of economic recovery."

Markets also were encouraged when Algerian Oil Minister Chakib Khelil said compliance with production quotas among OPEC members will improve to 95% by the time the group meets in May. Sources reported OPEC was in 79% compliance in February with its December decision, which in conjunction with an earlier quota adjustment was to have reduced output by 4.2 million b/d to 24.85 million b/d (OGJ Online, Mar. 16, 2009). However, crude prices were down in early trading Mar. 17.

Jakob observed, "Saudi Arabia has now to prepare for the US withdrawal from Iraq and probably did not want to upset the new US administration with an OPEC cut 2 weeks before the king meets [President Barack] Obama at the G20 meeting (Apr. 2). The Algerian oil minister has confirmed on different newswires that the G20 meeting was a 'factor' that led to OPEC (i.e. Saudi Arabia) leaving things unchanged over the weekend."

Analysts at Pritchard Capital Partners LLC, New Orleans, reported Saudi Arabia has reduced its production 18% to 7.86 million b/d since July and is willing to keep output below its quota level of 8 million b/d unless consumers want more. Analysts noted an oil price of $60-75/bbl will be necessary for production of higher-cost oil resources such as ethanols, tar sands, and heavy oils.

In other news, Chevron Corp. said Mar. 16 it shut in 10,000 b/d of crude production in Nigeria after rebel attacks ruptured an oil pipeline at the Abiteye flow station near Warri in the Niger Delta.

Pritchard Capital Partners reduced its crude price estimates to an average $52.50/bbl for 2009 from its previous projection of $60/bbl. The reduction was to $65/bbl from $75/bbl for 2010. It lowered its natural gas price estimates to $4.75/Mcf from $6.25/Mcf for 2009 and to $6.25/Mcf from $7.50/Mcf for 2010. "Although the crude oil markets appear to have bottomed, signs of weakness in the natural gas markets persist. Lower-than-expected industrial and consumer demand coupled with an increasing potential for LNG imports and US shale resource plays taking flight should put downward pressure on natural gas prices through the first half of 2009," analysts said.

Energy prices
The April contract for benchmark US gained $1.10 to $47.35/bbl Mar. 16 on NYMEX. The May contract increased $1.02 to $48.05/bbl. On the US spot market, WTI at Cushing, Okla., continued to trail the April futures contract, up $1.10 to $47.35/bbl. Heating oil for April delivery was up 1.58¢ to $1.21/gal on NYMEX. The April contract for reformulated blend stock for oxygenate blending (RBOB) increased 1.44¢ to $1.37/gal.

Natural gas for the same month lost 8.2¢ to $3.87/MMbtu on NYMEX. On the US spot market, gas at Henry Hub, La., dropped 13.5¢ to $3.80/MMbtu.

In London, the expiring April IPE contract for North Sea Brent crude declined 95¢ to $43.98/bbl. Subsequent months gained and remained in contango through February 2010. Gas oil for April dropped $8.75 to $381.25/tonne.

The average price for OPEC's basket of 12 reference crudes fell $1.10 to $43.05 bbl on Mar. 16.


Source: Oil and Gas Journal

oilman_vn (Mar. 18)

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Alternative Test Method for Olefins in Gasoline

The December 8, 2008 Federal Register (Vol. 73/No. 236) details the EPA’s decision. This is a major breakthrough for laboratories consumed with FIA testing.
The PAC SFC can analyze up to 96 samples, with very little operator time or effort. Using EZChrom, the SFC reports Olefins (1-25%) in less than 20 minutes with much BETTER ACCURACY and NO SUBJECTIVITY!

Refiners, importers and oxygenate blenders producing gasoline are required to test RFG and CG for various fuel parameters including olefins. The test method for determining olefin content is specified in the regulation. Recently, the American Petroleum Institute (API) requested in a letter to EPA that ASTM D6550-05 be designated by EPA as an alternative test method in the regulations for olefins in gasoline. EPA has evaluated API's request on this test method issue and agrees. Thus, EPA is taking action today to allow ASTM D6550-05 as an alternative test method in the regulations for olefins in gasoline, provided that its results are correlated to ASTM D1319. The allowance of this additional alternative test method for olefins in gasoline will provide the regulated community additional flexibility in meeting their testing requirements.

All of the test method updates in this proposed rule will improve the performance and/or utilization by industry of ASTM standard test methods. This direct final rule does not impose a regulatory burden on anyone, including small businesses. Instead, this direct final rule will have a positive impact by improving performance of the industry, including small businesses, by enabling them to use more current voluntary consensus-based standard test methods. In addition, the allowance of ASTM D 6550-05 will provide additional flexibility to the regulated community, including small businesses, in meeting olefins in gasoline testing requirements. We have therefore concluded that today's direct final rule will relieve regulatory burden for all effected small entities.

This rule is effective February 6, 2009 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by January 7, 2009.

Sources:
http://www.paclp.com/products.aspx?product_id=180

oilman_vn (10 March, 2009)

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Dầu cách điện – Insulating oils

  1. Lấy mẫu

    Có nhiều tiêu chuẩn qui định lấy mẫu dầu cách điện hay dầu biến thế tùy thuộc chỉ tiêu thử nghiệm bạn muốn đánh giá như sau:

  • ASTM D 923 - Standard practice for sampling electrical insulating liquids
  • ASTM D 3613 - Standard practice for sampling electrical insulating oils for gas analysis and determination of water content
  • IEC 60475 - Method of sampling liquid dielectrics
  • IEC 60567 - Guide for the sampling of gases and of oil from oil-filled electrical equipment and for the analysis of free and dissolved gases
  • Do not use small sampling port on side of the drain valve
  1. Đánh giá

    Dầu cách điện thông thường có 4 loại,

  • Silicon based oil
  • Mineral oil
  • Synthetic oils
  • Ester / Vegetable oils

Chúng ta nên nhớ rằng "A test is only as good as the sample", và hầu hết các máy biến thế sử dụng dầu cách điện có nguồn gốc dầu khoáng (mineral oil) nên lấy ASTM D 3487 – Satndard specification for mineral insulating oil used in electrical apparatus để đánh giá. Các chỉ tiêu chính của dầu biến thế

  • Interfacial tension (Measure of contamination) – ASTM D 971
  • Acidity (Measure of oxidation) – ASTM D 2440, D 2112
  • Moisture (Decreases dielectric)
  • Dielectric breakdown – ASTM D 877, D 1816
  • Power Factor (Indication of contamination and deterioration) – ASTM D 924
  • Color – ASTM D 1500
  • Dissolved gas analysis (H2, CH4, C2H4, C2H6, C2H2)
  • Water – ASTM D 1533
Translated and annotated by oilmanvn, January 2009

Tuesday, January 06, 2009

ISO/TS 29001:2003 - Quality Management System

ISO/TS 29001 First edition was published on September 15, 2003, see ISO Press Release for details. ISO/TS 29001:2003 was prepared to provide supplemental requirements to ISO 9001:2000 Quality Management Systems – Requirements and, accordingly, includes the original text of ISO 9001:2000 unaltered and in its entirety as boxed text, while the supplemental requirements are outside the boxes.

ISO/TS 29001:2003 was prepared in cooperation with the American Petroleum Institute in a joint working group between ISO/TC67/WG2 with liaison from ISO/TC176/SC2, and the API SC18 Q1 Task Force. The original text of ISO/TS 29001:2003 unaltered and in its entirety has been adopted as the Quality Management System (QMS) within API Spec Q1 Seventh edition, June 15, 2003, Effective date December 15, 2003. API Spec Q1 also includes, as Annex A, the provisions for the API Monogram Program; this Program is proprietary to API and is not included in ISO/TS 29001:2003.

The questions and issues addressed here have arisen from various parts of the industry and the responses have been developed based on the best information available to the Management Committee (MC) of ISO/TC67 Materials, equipment and offshore structures for petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries, and have been endorsed by the TC67 MC for distribution to its members for information.

A brief discussion of the "infrastructure" relevant to ISO 9001 may help to clarify some of the terms and the issues relevant to ISO/TS 29001:

1 - If a Certification Body (CB) claims that it is competent to certify according ISO 9001 it can issue the certificates to any interested organization;
2 - If the CB is accredited by a National Accreditation Body (NAB) as an Accredited Certification Body (ACB) and as competent to certify according to ISO 9001 the certificate can show the NAB logo;
3 - If the NAB takes part in the Multilateral Recognition Agreement (MRA) of the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) it can readily be recognized by another NAB (inside IAF/MRA). In this case the certificates issued by the ACB can show the logo of the other NAB as well. So, a certificate can be issued in one country and exhibit the logo of the NAB of another country. This ensures that the certificate is "recognized" within that other country. This rule is intended to minimize multi-accreditation by the ACBs and reduce the costs of certification.

The "infrastructure" implied by [2] and [3] above is neither in place nor currently planned with respect to ISO/TS 29001.
Note that the term Registrar is sometimes used; the definition is the same as for Certification Body.



Theo:

http://www.wahanaconsultants.com/

http://www.mntechnology.com/enrollment/course_desc.asp?course_id=qms%20903

http://www.tc67.net/